健康全搜

首页 > 医学文献 > 临床与专科 > 口腔医学 > 正文

聚合酶链反应与常规方法检测牙龈卟啉单胞菌的比较研究

  来源:120online      日期:2007-05-07
中华口腔医学杂志2000年第1期第35卷论著作者:金笑一 杨圣辉 王申五 刘红 张春梅单位:金笑一(首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院综合科 100050 北京);杨圣辉 张春梅(口腔医学研究所);王申五(北京医科大学附属人民医院中心实验室);刘红(北京医科大学附属人民医院中心实验室)关键词:聚合酶链反应;卟啉类;基因...

  摘 要目的 使用聚合酶链反应 (polymerase chain reaction, PCR)检测龈下菌斑的牙龈卟啉菌,并与常规的培养法和间接免疫荧光法相比较。方法 设计纤毛亚单位蛋白基因内的一对引物,用PCR对92个龈下菌斑标本进行扩增,与其他两种方法的检出率进行比较。结果 相同的菌斑标本,PCR的检出率为94.6%,培养法为48.9% ,间接免疫荧光法为68.5% ,前者明显高于后两者(P<0.001)。结论 对牙周病致病菌的检测,PCR较培养法和间接免疫荧光法具有较高的敏感性。本项研究建立了一种比较适合临床应用的牙周菌斑PCR检测方法。

A comparison of polymerase chain reaction with other two widely used methods in detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis

JIN Xiaoyi

  (Beijing Stomatology Hospital , Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing 100050, China)

  YANG Shenghui

  WANG Shenwu

  AbstractObjective To compare the efficiency of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with cultural method and indirect immunofluorescence(IF) in detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.g) in oral plaque samples.Methods 92 subgingival plaque samples were collected from patients of three kinds of periodontal disease. A program using PCR to detect Fimbrilin gene (Fim A) was designed to detect P.g. The efficiency of this PCR method was compared with cultural method and IF. Results The positive-rate of PCR was 94.6%, while that of cultural method and IF was only 48.9% and 68.5% respectively. The difference was significant in statistical analysis (P<0.001).Conclusion PCR is more sensitive than culture method and IF in detecting pathogens of periodontal diseases. The study provides a simplified and efficient method for oral clinical use.

  Key words:Polymerase chain reaction (PCR);Porphyrins;Gene▲

[1] 2 3 4 5  下一页


关键字:
上一篇:降钙素基因相关肽阳性神经纤维在鼠颞下颌关节中的分布